MAILARCHIVE PDF · BLOG

All posts

Finance and audits

EML, MSG or MBOX: choosing a format for long-term email storage

The export format decides what survives a change of mail client, a new laptop and a review five years later. We compare three everyday formats and explain why a PDF copy for reading belongs next to them.

Three formats, three scenarios

EML is one message per file.

  • MSG is one message in Outlook format, with properties plain text does not carry.
  • MBOX is a whole folder of messages in a single file.
  • All three survive export from popular mail applications; they differ in how easy they are to work with once that application is gone.

EML: one message per file

An EML file is a single message per RFC 5322 with MIME parts: headers, body and attachments live in one file, and .eml has become the common extension.

  • Thunderbird, Apple Mail, Outlook and dozens of tools open it; you can name it by date, file it into folders and forward it to a colleague.
  • Losing one file does not touch the others — a valuable property for long-term storage.

MSG: convenient inside Outlook

MSG is Outlook's container based on the Compound File format: alongside the message text it stores flags, categories, statuses and other Microsoft properties.

  • If your correspondence lives in Outlook and its internal attributes matter, MSG preserves the most.
  • The flip side is that it is proprietary: mostly Microsoft tooling reads it, and another application may drop some of the fields.

MBOX: a whole folder in one file

MBOX puts all messages of a folder sequentially into one file — compact and simple.

  • The drawback mirrors the benefit: while the file is intact everything inside is intact; once it is damaged you have to work through the whole document rather than one message.
  • Different applications write separators and escaping slightly differently, so an MBOX from one client does not always open cleanly in another — worth testing before a migration.

Why a PDF for reading belongs next to them

The source format is good for processing and awkward for communication: opening an EML or MBOX needs an application, and you cannot paste a piece of a message into a chat or a memo.

  • A PDF opens everywhere, prints well and looks the same for everyone — which is why an archive of message PDFs is what you send to an auditor, an expert or a new hire.
  • Remember its role: the PDF here is a reading copy, not the source; any reprocessing starts from the original files.

An honest note on PDF/A and archival profiles

Some regulations call for PDF/A — the PDF profile designed for long-term archiving. eml-pdf.com offers PDF/A-2b output: every PDF is re-encoded with Ghostscript, fonts are embedded, interactive elements are dropped, and the state is recorded in the manifest.

  • If re-encoding fails for a file, the archive keeps a regular PDF — the manifest shows it. Conformance is not checked by an independent validator, so it does not prove archival status; keep the original EML, MSG or MBOX files in the set — they remain the primary record.

A practical recommendation

Keep both: the source export in its original format, plus the ZIP with PDFs, the index and checksums.

  • Once a year, check that both still open and that the checksum file matches current values.
  • Do not let the only copy be something a single application can read: the combination of original, readable copy and manifest survives any change of mail system.